These were heavy memory/processor intensive testing we did when we became the first to bump the Mac Pro 2013 to 128GB / doubling that 64GB factory max. despite the memory benchmark tests showing huge memory bandwidth hit. When you roll into application set (or even Photoshop can use it on a hi-res major effect render, etc) that exceeds that 64GB wired - night and day how much faster it is vs. When you are are running an application load that uses less than 64GB of wired memory, the impact if that is about a 0.25 to 1% reduction in real world application performance. In the Mac Pro 2013 - going past 64GB means using 32GB dimms which take you from 1866MHz down to 1333MHz memory bus speed. Thanks for you patience in reading this, and for any insight you can offer! System report shows all 128GB recognized, and all cores appear to be functioning as designed.Īnything else I should check? Or is this normal behavior? Single core 372, multi-core 4805.įor the difference between the Geekbench versions, I can only assume they changed the rating system?Īs for the decreasing scores as the RAM increases, I don't know why that would happen. Then I realized Geekbench has a 5.1.0 Tryout. I installed all 128GB of the OWC RAM, ran Geekbench again. I installed 96GB of the OWC RAM (3 each in slots 1-3 and 5-7), ran Geekbench again. I ran Geekbench 4.3.2 Tryout with the 64GB Hynix. Mac processor comparison: M1 & M2 vs Intel. Startup disk is a 1TB SSD, and it's pretty full (about 47GB available). Our forum sponsor had a garage sale, and I bought 2x used 64GB kits of their 1333MHz DDR3. I'm running Mojave 10.14.6, with a Radeon RX 580 8GB card. It came with 64GB Hynix 1333 MHz DDR3 (8GB x8 slots). IIRC, it was a 4.1 flashed to a 5.1, and upgraded to 2x 3.33GHz 6 core Zeon. There’s iMac in the pipeline along with Mac Pro powered by Apple silicon which has been long rumored.About 2 years ago I bought a used Mac Pro on the eBay. The Cupertino-based giant is expected to launch M2-powered 14” and 16” MacBook Pro sometime in 2023 although they were expected to arrive in October/November this year but things didn’t fall into place and thus, delayed untill 2023. We have caught the whiff that the chip could be fabbed on a 3nm process which takes it miles apart from 5nm process offering significant gains in efficiency and performance. Apple M2 chip was fabbed on a 5nm process from TSMC, however, it remains unclear what process Apple will use for both M2 Pro and M2 Max. It is 50% more than the current generations of MacBook Pro devices that offer up to 64GB of RAM storage. What’s more exciting is the fact that the upcoming Mac device powered by Apple M2 Max comes with up to 96GB of configurable RAM variants. It is 320MHz faster than M1 Pro for some context. Last year, the M1 Max arrived with almost the same setup albeit with a 10-core CPU. It comes paired with a 64KB L1 data cache, a 128KB L1 instruction cache, and a 4MB L2 cache onboard. We have an Apple Max M2 right here with a 12-core setup clocked at 3.54GHz frequency. The Geekbench listing gives a peek into the configuration as well. The moniker could be for the next-gen MacBook Pro or Mac Studio although nothing can be set in stone at the moment. In one of the listings, the device scored 1,889 and 14,586 points while in another, it scored 1,853 and 13,855 points on single-core and multi-core tests. Dubbed with the model number Max 14.6, both Geekbench 5 benchmark listings show the Apple M2 Max sitting under the hood.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |