![]() Mathematical Sciences Research Institute Publicationsĭynamics, Ergodic Theory, and Geometry Dedicated to Anatole Katok Several sections of this list focus on problems beyond the areas covered in the surveys, and all are sure to inspire and guide further research. The articles are complemented by a fifty-page commented problem list, compiled by the editor with the help of numerous specialists. Among the specific areas of interest are random walks and billiards, diffeomorphisms and flows on surfaces, amenability and tilings. Other articles by Eigen, Feres, Kochergin, Krieger, Navarro, Pinto, Prasad, Rand and Robinson cover subjects in hyperbolic, parabolic and symbolic dynamics as well as ergodic theory. Fisher’s survey on local rigidity of group actions is a broad and up-to-date account of a flourishing subject built on the fact that for actions of noncyclic groups, topological conjugacy commonly implies smooth conjugacy. In symplectic geometry, a fast-growing field having its roots in classical mechanics, Cieliebak, Hofer, Latschev and Schlenk give a definitive survey of quantitative techniques and symplectic capacities, which have become a central research tool. ![]() In the next few lemmas, we will show that k X maps the exceptional fibers as shown in Figure 3.1.In this book, which arose from an MSRI research workshop cosponspored by the Clay Mathematical Institute, leading experts give an overview of several areas of dynamical systems that have recently experienced substantial progress. Let k X : X → X denote the induced map on the complex manifold X. We use homogeneous coordinates by identifying a point ( t, y ) ∈ C 2 with ∈ P 2. For E 1 and P j, 1 ≤ j ≤ n − 1 we use local coordinate systems defined in (2.2–4). That is, in a neighborhood of Q we use a ( ξ 1, v 1 ) = ( t 2 / y, y / t ) coordinate system. The iterated blow-up of p 1, …, p n − 1 is exactly the process described in §2, so we will use the local coordinate systems defined there. (iv) blow up p j : = E 1 ∩ P j − 1 with exceptional fiber P j for 2 ≤ j ≤ n − 1. (iii) blow up p 1 : = E 1 ∩ C 1 and let P 1 denote the exceptional fiber over p 1, (ii) blow up q : = E 1 ∩ C 4 and let Q denote the exceptional fiber over q, We define a complex manifold π X : X → P 2 by blowing up points e 1, q, p 1, …, p n − 1 in the following order: (i) blow up e 1 = and let E 1 denote the exceptional fiber over e 1, We comment that the construction of X and ~ k can yield further information about the dynamics of k (see, for instance, and ). ![]() The general existence of such a map ~ k when δ ( k ) > 1 was shown in. This method has also been used by Takenawa. By the birational invariance of δ (see and ) we conclude that δ ( k F ) is the spectral radius of ~ k ∗. There is a well defined map ~ k ∗ : P i c ( X ) → P i c ( X ), and the point is to choose X so that the induced map ~ k satisfies ( ~ k ∗ ) n = ( ~ k n ) ∗. That is, we find a birational map φ : X → P 2, and we consider the new birational map ~ k = φ ∘ k F ∘ φ − 1. The approach we use here is to replace the original domain P 2 by a new manifold X. As was noted by Fornæss and Sibony, if there is an exceptional curve whose orbit lands on a point of indeterminacy, then the degree is not multiplicative: ( d e g ( k F ) ) n ≠ d e g ( k n F ). ![]() That is, there are exceptional curves, which are mapped to points and there are points of indeterminacy, which are blown up to curves. We will analyze the family k F by inspecting the blowing-up and blowing-down behavior.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |